Feedback given week 3

Feedback given week 3

Review of Jeroen Huisman

Hi there,

I think you chose an excellent subject to apply theory to. I do miss a link to a news article to introduce the case (however I myself also didn’t do that yet in my blog), but I think it would be helpful to link to an article. I got a bit confused myself with the use of –[[ as sometimes it referred to a source, whilst in other cases a comment on the side was made. There didn’t seem to be a standard convention on the use of these symbols. Sometimes they also had a great deal of text within them so it sort of distracted or confused me somehow. Also there are some small, but confusing type errors “how me make choice” (WE), “between different decision makers in taken into account” (IS), etc.

Please do connect “emotions don’t necessarily play a role” with the previous section as now I first thought it was the start of the bounded rational explanation, but it seems to below to the RAM model.

For the rest the article is nice. First theory is explained and then applied to the case. It is a textbook example of how to write the blog. You could perhaps use the same terms again in the text as you have used in the graph. Most optimal way in the RAM model and not only emotion as you now used well, but also interaction, information and lack of time (although the latter you do mention specifically).

All in all you have done a pretty good job. 

Review of
Imme Groet
Unfortunately the link didn't work